<aside> ℹ️ About

This post explores the relationship between an option straddle and volatility.

You will learn:

Part I: Measures of Volatility

The Difference Between SD and MAD

<aside> 🔑 Key Takeaways

If the underlying distribution is Gaussian:

MAD = .8 x SD

SD = 1.25 x MAD

You could expect the ratio to differ for non-Gaussian distributions. When examining data, computing both statistics can give you a clue about its nature.

In the text example above, the MAD/SD ratio of only 27% is a clue:

Even though the MAD is more useful than SD for telling us what outcomes are typical, the ratio indicates that there are some highly skewed outliers.

</aside>

Part II: Interpreting the Straddle

Understanding the Straddle

<aside> 🔑 Key Takeaways

  1. The visual depiction of the ATF call:

    Untitled

  2. For the ATF strike the call and put have the same value!

which yields…


  1. ATF Straddle Approximation:

Untitled

where:

S = forward price

σ = annualized volatility

t = fraction of a year until expiry

<aside> ⏪ In case you want to walk through it again:

Visual Derivation of Straddle Approximation

</aside>

</aside>

Look at the key takeaways thus far. What do you see?

The mean absolute deviation is .80 of the standard deviation and the straddle is .80 of the volatility.

The straddle is the MAD!

The volatility, which is computed just like a standard deviation, gives large moves extra weight. But the straddle is a better reflection of what move size we typically see.

It will cost you .80 of the standard deviation to buy a fairly priced straddle. Let’s plug that into a normal curve’s cumulative distribution function:

University of Iowa

University of Iowa