<aside> ℹ️
About
Margin is one of those topics where 80% of retail traders operate on folk wisdom and the other 20% operate on prime-brokerage intuition that doesn't quite apply to their retail account. This post is the practitioner's map. We'll cover:
Heads up on a regulatory change: As of April 14, 2026, the SEC approved FINRA's elimination of the Pattern Day Trader rule and its $25,000 minimum. The new framework, effective June 4, 2026 with an 18-month phase-in through October 20, 2027, replaces trade-counting with real-time intraday margin standards calibrated to actual position risk. The PDT threshold is going away — but the intraday exposure monitoring it's being replaced with is, if anything, closer to the IBKR model. The post reflects the new world.
</aside>
Every U.S. retail margin account runs on one of two rule sets. They differ in what they measure (fixed strategy formulas vs. scenario-based stress) and in how much leverage they hand you.
| Dimension | Reg T | Portfolio Margin |
|---|---|---|
| Governing model | Fixed % per strategy template | OCC TIMS scenario stress |
| Account minimum | $2,000 (uncovered options) | $110K open / $100K maintain |
| Stock leverage (overnight) | 2:1 | ~6.7:1 diversified / ~12.5:1 high-cap index |
| Sees your whole book? | No — each strategy in isolation | Yes — per underlying, with cross-product offsets |
| Rewards hedging? | Barely — only via recognized spread templates | Yes — hedges collapse worst-case loss |
| Single-stock diversification? | Each naked position margined independently | Still 0% offset between names |
| Init vs. Maintenance | Identical for options | Init = 110% of maintenance |
| IRAs eligible? | Yes | No |
| SMA applies? | Yes — EOD Reg T check | Yes, on incremental trades |
| Intraday PDT threshold | $25K (being eliminated June 4, 2026) | $25K (same, being eliminated) |
Reg T is blunt. It doesn't know the difference between an iron condor on SPY and a naked short call on a meme stock — it has a formula for each and applies it. This is a feature if you're running simple strategies and don't want to think about correlation. It's a bug if you're running a book where hedges do most of the work.
PM is risk-aware, but only within the boundaries TIMS understands. It's generous to hedged books. It's punitive to concentrated single-name books (because of the 0% cross-name offset, a fact that catches a lot of people). It treats broad-based indexes very kindly (8% down / 6% up stress) because those markets have deep history and institutional hedging infrastructure.